Thursday, March 30, 2006

Regarding the Barnett Formula

I've just been going through some unread e-mails in my inbox and came across this little gem, concerning the ridiculous Barnett Formula, under which, in short, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland get English taxes when they have declared economic 'sovereignty' (but don't get me started on what constitutes sovereignty).

Wednesday, March 22, 2006

Brilliant.

Absolutely brilliant.

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

Clarke throws his opinion in

God. This government couldn't possibly get any more pathetic. Charles Clarke is now questioning the competence of Jack Dromey (Labour's treasurer), as he did not know of these 'loans' made to the party.
This really is one of the most obvious cases of trying to shift the blame that I have ever seen (and probably Tony doing it with Charles as his giant gibbon-faced puppet).
I just don't even know what to say to all of this crap anymore. It really is ridiculous. Didn't John Prescott actually say he knew nothing of these loans either? Clarke is just making himself look an idiot.
 
 
Well, moreso.

Thursday, March 16, 2006

This Week Cancelled

God, I hate sports. This Week has to be one of the best programmes on TV. How can the BBC possibly justify cancelling it two weeks in a row, in order to watch a bunch of jumped-up twits talking about some other jumped-up twats running around and generally being annoying. Pointless in the extreme.
 
Bring back politics!

A Note From David Cameron

I've just read an excellent article from David Cameron, published at ConservativeHome.com today to mark his 100th day as leader of the Conservative party. I hope the message gets out to the electorate:

"One of the biggest challenges facing all of us in politics today is cynicism. Too many people think there's no point in voting because you can't believe a word that politicians say and, if elected, they'll ignore the wishes of the electorate and do whatever they like.

I want to change that. But I know that the only way to change the perception is to change the reality first. Britain can't afford another government that doesn't deliver on its promises. That's why I've been careful, in my first 100 days as Leader of the Opposition, not to promise the earth.

I'm an idealist but I'm also determined that every policy the Conservative Party creates will be hard-headed, practical and durable. We're not aiming to win a general election for the sake of grabbing power – we intend to govern well, make Britain a better place and leave office with the reputation of politics and politicians enhanced.

Some Tories are impatient for a comprehensive set of policies. I understand that. After all, no one is going to vote for a manifesto consisting of mood music. However, my aim is to build our platform on solid foundations. That's why I've set up a series of policy groups to examine the key issues in depth. The participants are people with real credibility and expertise in their fields and I'm confident that they will deliver ideas we can unite around and be proud of.

We're working on the details of policy but I've already set out a clear direction. There are a number of ways in which the next Conservative government will be different to – and better than – Labour.

Society will be fairer. Widening opportunity for those who need it most is a vital part of my Conservatism. Gordon Brown thinks it's enough to keep the disadvantaged on a drip feed of handouts. I don't. Of course those in poverty must have financial help but they deserve much more. Under Labour, social mobility has actually decreased. Our policies will be aimed at the least well off and will address the need to support vulnerable families, provide proper education, tackle the epidemic of debt, fight crime and drug abuse and give people a decent environment to live in.

Britain will be safer. Our security requires strong armed forces with high morale and a relentless determination to beat terrorism. We need practical steps - like proper border controls - to combat terror, rather than expensive and ineffective measures like ID cards. And so that's why we will be hard-nosed defenders of freedom and security. Crime must also be tackled. Labour's proposals to cut sentences for serious offences like rape will be rejected and reversed.

The environment will be greener. Climate change is the single biggest challenge facing our planet. As Britain's prime minister, I will work ceaselessly to gain international support to tackle it. On a smaller scale our policies will be directed at energy saving, locally produced food, better air quality and conserving our landscape.

Power will be closer to the people. I'm determined to bring decision making nearer to the people. That means reversing Labour's centralising, big government approach and an end to regionalisation by the back door and no EU constitution.

The economy will be richer. Britain's competitiveness has declined since 1997. As other countries have woken up to the need to win business, our companies are burdened by a growing mountain of red tape and regulation. Conservatives are proud to be the party of enterprise. And we won't put that at risk – which is why we've pledged to put stability before tax cuts.

People will be healthier. The National Health Service is underperforming under Labour. A wall of bureaucracy stands between patients and the treatment they need. We want our health service to be run by doctors, nurses and other professionals. Alongside this, a Tory government will promote a much greater awareness of the importance of good diet and exercise. We'll encourage but we won't nanny.

And all of this will be underpinned by my core belief of trusting people. If you trust people, then you also empower them and their communities. I know that I don't have all the answers – nobody can say that. I realise that we're all in this together – government, business, the voluntary sector, families and individuals. And by realising that we have a shared responsibility for our future then we can be much more positive about the challenges that we face.

Conservatism is not, and never has been, a dogma. Our values are enduring but our party has thrived for 200 years because we always evolve to meet the challenges of each new era. There's a new mood of confidence and optimism around and, when the moment comes, we'll be ready."

Oh dear.

Brilliant. First, it appears that the Labour party are offering cash-for-honours, after a number of people making large loans to the party were recommended for peerages.
Now, it seems that the Labour Party's treasurer, Jack Dromey, knew NOTHING of these loans at all.
 
Oh, how the plot thickens...

Tuesday, March 14, 2006

Serbia vs. Montenegro (re: Eurovision)

Apparently, there's huge arguments going on between Serbia and Montenegro concerning their choice (as they compete as one) for the Eurovision Song Contest.
Jesus. It's just Eurovision. The whole thing is a fucking joke. No one with any sense actually takes it seriously. Christ. Just fucking get over it.
 
Idiots.

Sunday, March 12, 2006

Ruth Kelly

She really does THE most annoying voice in the history of anything. Ever.

The Very British BBC

Apparently, in a new charter to be unveiled this week, the BBC will see its purpose to "inform, educate and entertain" expand much further, for now they will be required to promote British citizenship.
 
Now, I have to admit, I'm in two minds about this at the moment. On the one hand, it could help to some extent with building a sense of responsibility, respect, and patriotism once again (although its effect would be limited as ITV will not have to do this). On the other hand of course, it is just a bit worrying. It could, arguably, force the BBC to effectively become a total propaganda machine for the government (although many would say that it already is, in which case, even more so).
 
One of the things which particularly worries me about this is that many will (and have announced their intention to) exploit this new aspect of the BBC's remit in order to pressure for "cleaner" programming. John Beyer, the director of Mediawatch-UK (read: Mary Whitehouse), said: "This means much more than the BBC thinks. It's not just things like impartial news. It is about reflecting good behaviour on the BBC and using good language. The BBC has a moral role. As a lobby group we will now use this phrase as a way to make the BBC act responsibly."
Certainly, the BBC does need to work on its impartiality, but for the rest of Mediawatch's interests, I think they really are quite out of touch with the majority of public opinion. People are more sensible, modern, mature and tolerant that Mediawatch seem to give them credit for, and really not bothered about this kind of thing anymore. Consequently, they need to focus on pressuring for that impartiality in the news, but no more.
 
I wait with interest on the development of this story.
 
 
(Thanks to John for the tip-off.)

Friday, March 10, 2006

The Rover Loan

A little under a year ago, our wonderful government 'loaned' the troubled (with obviously no realistic sign of the troubles being rectified anytime soon) MG Rover group a grand total of £6.5 million in order to keep paying staff wages for a while. This week, they are finally coming under criticism for this, after the National Audit Office said the prospect of a deal was "remote", and the Conservatives followed, pointing out what every right-thinking person knew; that this was an "election bribe".
 
To be honest I can't really believe it was allowed to happen in the first place. I don't remember a government having effectively GIVEN a failing company £6.5 million in a feeble attempt to keep staff 'on-side' in the past, and with good reason. It's not a government's place to bail out business. It's a government's place to fund public services, and provide a bit of help in finding work for those who have been made redundant. That's where this £6.5 million should have gone, if the government really were hell-bent on 'helping'.
Of course, really, it should have gone into education or the NHS or somesuch.
 
What a waste of public money. The government really need to pay it back themselves.

Census Insult - Part II

An update on this... Supposedly, the BBC mis-quoted census co-ordinator Joy Dobbs, and there WILL be an English option for nationality on the 2011 census. The original article has now been changed, but many are still not convinced. We shall wait and see...
 
Either way, the point still stands. We English are constantly discriminated against in this kind of fashion, and it's absolutely disgusting. Something needs to be done.

Fucking shocking.

A new fetish - the most shocking I have ever heard of - has surfaced on Chinese websites. In this new form of "snuff", live animals such as dogs, rabbits, toads, and even tiny kittens are stomped on, and ultimately crushed to death by "sexy" (I say 'sexy' in EXTREME quotation) women wearing "stockings and high heels". It's just absolutely fucking sickening.
I can't believe that this is allowed to carry on, especially with the amount of control which the Chinese authorities reign over their citizen's Internet access. It really needs to be stopped. In every form. Right now. Web, print, video, everything.
The people who make - and 'get off on' - this kind of sickeningly vile practice deserve much, MUCH worse than what they are dishing out. I cannot accurately describe my complete and utter hatred for them and contempt for their lives. Utter, utter cunts.

Thursday, March 09, 2006

Fucking shocking.

A new fetish - the most shocking I have ever heard of - has surfaced on Chinese websites. In this new form of "snuff", live animals such as dogs, rabbits, toads, and even tiny kittens are stomped on, and ultimately crushed to death by "sexy" (I say 'sexy' in EXTREME quotation) women wearing "stockings and high heels". It's just absolutely fucking sickening.
I can't believe that this is allowed to carry on, especially with the amount of control which the Chinese authorities reign over their citizen's Internet access. It really needs to be stopped. In every form. Right now. Web, print, video, everything.
The people who make - and 'get off on' - this kind of sickeningly vile practice deserve much, MUCH worse than what they are dishing out. I cannot accurately describe my complete and utter hatred for them and contempt for their lives. Utter, utter cunts.

Census Insult

So, it would appear that the next United Kingdom census, due in 2011 (it is conducted every ten years), contains the following options for nationality: Welsh, Scottish, Irish and British. But no English (I would assume also 'Other', but this is not detailed in the article).
English is NOT interchangable with British, and so we, the English, are being subjected to mass, national discrimination once again. It is absolutely disgusting.

Don't get me wrong, I am British. I am proud to be British. But foremost, I am English, and if the Welsh, Scottish and Northern Irish can class themselves as so, we should be allowed to class ourselves British. It is blatant institutional racism, and I urge anyone with any decency and/or interest in politics and democracy to help campaign for the English to be properly represented.

There's a number of things you can do to help:

...And of course spread the word. This is not something that will go away by itself. You CAN help make the difference.

The Witanagemot Club

Xinomorph is now a proud member of The Witanagemot Club. We work to raise awareness of the great democratic deficit placed upon the English by the current political structure.
The Scots have their own Parliament, the Welsh have what is essentially their own Parliament, as does Northern Ireland (when they're not fighting and can be trusted to run it...), but England has nothing. Only the umbrella, 'parent' Parliament which covers the whole of the United Kingdom.
As such, we believe that England needs its own Parliament.
 
 
(Ok, admittedly, I'd favour devolution and/or England ruling everyone else, but it doesn't look like that'll happen any time soon.)

Wednesday, March 08, 2006

Gypsy Evictions

Very happy about this one. A gypsy/traveller/whatever family has lost their case with the Law Lords. They had argued that their human rights were broken after being evicted from a 'recreational field' (ie, some form of park or similar public space) owned by Leeds City Council.
 
I'm not suggesting that these people shouldn't have somewhere to live, but this kind of thing really is shocking. What makes them think that they have right to move onto a public space, ruining it for local taxpayers? It's trespass, pure and simple.

Super surfers

Christ. God know what this makes me then. Super Uber Pro Mega Surfer, perhaps? No, that's probably still not strong enough...