Xinomorph

After a series of black-on-black shootings in South London over the past couple of weeks, a large discussion has raised about how to tackle the situation, and of course good ol' Tony has jumped up with his not-at-all-reactionary announcement that the current 21 age lower-limit on mandatory 5-year sentences for carrying a gun will now be lowered to 17. But the man is an utter fool if he honestly thinks that it will make a blind bit of difference. For a start, most of these recent murder victims were under 17!

But that really doesn't touch on the truth. The simple fact is that these people do not fear arrest. They don't care if they get put in prison. Quite the opposite in fact. They live on shitty council estates, barely being able to afford to feed themselves in some cases I would bet, with nothing to do but go out and get involved in this kind of behaviour. But what do they get in prison? Sky TV. Hot, regular, nutritious meals. Training programmes. Access to gyms and sports equipment. Health services. And let's face it - it's not hard to get drugs in.

THAT is the real problem. These people have no respect for society, authority, or the police, and rather than being deterred by the thought of a prison sentence, life is so much easier inside that they aren't at all discouraged. And even if anyone doesn't "buy" that, it's not seen as something to be ashamed of or regret. It's an honour to them.

And that, my friends, is the real problem.

It is, quite frankly, fucking sickening. Three of the 4 refugee scum who killed twice in two weeks will not be deported, as the judge presiding over their trial did not have the power to do so. The 'sticking point' is that all four applied for refugee status before committing their crimes, and three were successful. Those three have been granted "indefinite leave" to remain in the country, and so can not be deported. But why should they be allowed to stay? They were granted a privilege (well, supposedly) in being able to stay here, and I would guess probably made some kind of agreement to abide by our laws. (Even if it wasn't literally communicated, I'm sure it would have been implied.) Why should the British taxpayer be forced to keep these utter shits in food, drink, health, and so on? They threw away any rights which may have been granted to them when they committed their crimes. Ship 'em back, and be quick about it.

A former BNP (British National Party) candidate is presently on trial for posession of explosives (well, chemicals which could be combined to form explosives anyway). But wait! His wife has told the court that he "often boasted of wanting to shoot Tony Blair". Now, I don't know about you, but how that is of any consequence I'm not sure. It doesn't seperate him from the rest of the population in the slightest! In fact, I can't think of many people I personally know who haven't thought about wanting to kill Blair in some way or another! Let's face it - the man is just a fool who attracts hatred.

We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to Respect our Bill of Rights 1689.

Our Government should recognise that all EU/EC/EEC ( etc ) law, regulation, guidance and acts are illegal and contrary to Our Bill of Rights 1689, the basis of Common Law.

"And I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm."

No article in the Bill of Rights can be repealed, despite Her Majesty's signatures to the contrary. Its decrees are supreme and override all other law, regulation and acts.

We respectfully request Her Majesty's Government to repeal, reverse and nullify any and all EU ( etc ) law, regulation, guidance and acts within 30 days of this petitions' closing date.